Rudolf Molleker vs Ruben Bemelmans Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W W L L L L
Form
L W W W L L L L L LHead To Head: Molleker 1 - 1 Bemelmans
They have played 5 sets in total, with Molleker winning 2 and Bemelmans winning 3. The last match between Molleker and Bemelmans was at the Heilbronn Challenger, 08-05-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Rudolf Molleker getting the victory 6-4 3-6 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rudolf Molleker | 1 |
| Ruben Bemelmans | 1 |
Heilbronn Challenger(08-05-2022)
6
4
3
6
7
6
| Molleker | Stats | Bemelmans |
|---|---|---|
| 39% (7-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 388 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 146 | Highest Rank | 84 |
| 24 | Age | 37 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 6 | Titles | 20 |
| 52% (239-219) | Career Total W/L | 57% (552-419) |
| $334,440 | Career Prize Money | $1,013,488 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Uchijima VS Montgomery PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Monteiro VS Quinn PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Rudolf Molleker
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 23 | Games Won | 28 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:31:43 | Average Match Time | 1:31:43 |
| 55% (76/137) | 1st Serve % | 54% (88/162) |
| 72% (55/76) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (64/88) |
| 48% (29/61) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (40/74) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 57% (8/14) |
| 36% (58/162) | Return Points Win % | 39% (53/137) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rudolf Molleker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Rudolf Molleker
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oriol Roca Batalla
Player
Rudolf Molleker
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
9
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
24 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
109
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alberto Barroso Campos
Player
Rudolf Molleker
63%
(
73 of
116)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
37%
(
16 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
47 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Rudolf Molleker
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
53%
(
18 of
34)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
10 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
43
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
85%
(
33 of
39)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
16 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
41
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Rudolf Molleker
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Rudolf Molleker
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Rudolf Molleker
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
34 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Finn Bass
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
5
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ruben Bemelmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Patten
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
16 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Daniel Little
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Michael Shaw
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (239/219) | Win/Loss | 57% (552/419) |
| 52% (555/516) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (1294/1046) |
| 51% (5203/5062) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12026/11063) |
| 46% (27/32) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (154/131) |
| 57% (172/128) | Clay Win/Loss | 48% (79/84) |
| 42% (37/51) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (259/155) |
| 27% (3/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 55% (60/49) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 2237 | Aces Total | 4063 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1370 | Total Double Faults | 1912 |
| 1:29:55 | Average Match Time | 1:5:15 |
| 485.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 580.46 |
| 60% (18613/31199) | 1st Serve % | 63% (32697/51842) |
| 70% (13063/18613) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (23728/32697) |
| 50% (6330/12586) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (9987/19146) |
| 44% (1147/2627) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1787/4501) |
| 38% (11471/30577) | Return Points Win % | 37% (19613/52826) |
| 47% (8/9) | Slam W/L | 56% (65/51) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 36% (9/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 35% (8/15) |
| 31% (12/27) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (77/77) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (115/128) | Challenger W/L | 55% (263/218) |
| 65% (104/55) | Futures W/L | 76% (130/42) |
| 53% (237/451) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (526/916) |
| 0% (0/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 43% (19/44) |
| 46% (69/149) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (208/420) |
| 51% (77/152) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (173/347) |
| 82% (244/201) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (542/456) |
| 18% (244/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (542/84) |
| 17% (214/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (428/92) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
